WHAT THE LAW DOINCongress, in plain words

H.J.Res. 88 · 119th Congress · Public Law 119-16

Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

Became lawEnvironmental Protection
IntroducedApr 2, 2025
Passed HouseMay 1, 2025
Passed SenateMay 22, 2025
To PresidentJun 6, 2025
Became lawJun 12, 2025

What it does

Sourced

This joint resolution revokes the waiver granted to the California Air Resources Board regarding its Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) regulations, which include new requirements for low-emission vehicles and zero-emission vehicles. (Under the Clean Air Act, California may seek waivers of the preemption prohibiting states from enacting certain emission standards.)

Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency notice titled California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service (Public Law, Jun 12, 2025).

Our plain-language breakdown, with what it means for you and the case for and against, is written once a bill starts to move.

What has happened

Sourced
  1. 2025-06-12Became Public Law No: 119-16.Library of Congress
  2. 2025-06-12Became Public Law No: 119-16.Library of Congress
  3. 2025-06-12Signed by President.Library of Congress
  4. 2025-06-12Signed by President.Library of Congress
  5. 2025-06-06Presented to President.House floor actions
  6. 2025-06-06Presented to President.Library of Congress
  7. 2025-05-23Message on Senate action sent to the House.Senate
  8. 2025-05-22Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 44. Record Vote Number: 277. Roll call recordSenate
  9. 2025-05-22Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 44. Record Vote Number: 277. Roll call recordLibrary of Congress
  10. 2025-05-22Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3101)Senate
  11. 2025-05-21Measure laid before Senate by motion. (consideration: CR S3052)Senate
  12. 2025-05-21Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 276. Roll call recordSenate
  13. 2025-05-21Received in the Senate, read twice.Senate
  14. 2025-05-01Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.House floor actions
  15. 2025-05-01On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 246 - 164 (Roll no. 114). (text: 04/30/2025 CR H1749) Roll call recordHouse floor actions
  16. 2025-05-01Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 246 - 164 (Roll no. 114). (text: 04/30/2025 CR H1749) Roll call recordLibrary of Congress
  17. 2025-05-01Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1786)House floor actions
  18. 2025-04-30POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 88, the Chair put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.House floor actions
  19. 2025-04-30The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.House floor actions
  20. 2025-04-30DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 88.House floor actions
  21. 2025-04-30Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H.J. Res. 89. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res 88 and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.House floor actions
  22. 2025-04-30Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 354. (consideration: CR H1748)House floor actions
  23. 2025-04-28Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 354 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88 and H The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 60, H.J. Res. 78, H.J. Res. 87, H.J. Res. 88, and H.J. Res. 89 under a closed rule with one hour of debate and one motion to recommit on each joint resolution.House floor actions
  24. 2025-04-28Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1629)Library of Congress
  25. 2025-04-07Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1421)Library of Congress
  26. 2025-04-02Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.House floor actions
  27. 2025-04-02Introduced in HouseLibrary of Congress
  28. 2025-04-02Introduced in HouseLibrary of Congress

Show key steps only

After it became law

Sourced

Since it became law on Jun 12, 2025, the Federal Register, the government's daily record of rules and notices, has published 1 document that name it: 1 proposed rule.

Named in the body of the document

The quote shows how each one uses the law: as the reason for a change, as background, or in passing.

  1. Proposed ruleMay 18, 2026Environmental Protection Agency
    Revision of Tier 4 Criteria Pollutant Standards, Part 1: Amendments to Phase-In Schedule for Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles
    See "Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to `California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision,' " Public Law 119-16, June 12, 2025, 139 Stat. 66.
    Comments closed Jul 6, 2026 · Would change 40 CFR part 85, 40 CFR part 86, 40 CFR part 1066

Found by searching the Federal Register for Public Law 119-16 and the law's names, then reading each document: every one listed contains them, and the quote is its own words. An agency can carry out a law without naming it, so this list can miss some. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Every new law's rules

Recorded votes

Sourced

May 1, 2025 · House roll call 114 · needed 1/2

On Passage: Passed 246–164

R 211 yes, 0 no, 8 present or not votingD 35 yes, 164 no, 14 present or not voting

How each member voted · Official record

May 21, 2025 · Senate roll call 276 · needed 1/2

On the Motion to Proceed: Motion to Proceed Agreed to 51–46

R 51 yes, 0 no, 2 present or not votingI 0 yes, 2 noD 0 yes, 44 no, 1 present or not voting

How each member voted · Official record

May 22, 2025 · Senate roll call 277 · needed 1/2

On the Joint Resolution: Joint Resolution Passed 51–44

R 50 yes, 0 no, 3 present or not votingI 0 yes, 2 noD 1 yes, 42 no, 2 present or not voting

How each member voted · Official record

Cosponsors

  • Brian Babin R-TX-36
  • Troy Balderson R-OH-12
  • Michael Baumgartner R-WA-5
  • Cliff Bentz R-OR-2
  • Stephanie I. Bice R-OK-5
  • Gus M. Bilirakis R-FL-12
  • Earl L. "Buddy" Carter R-GA-1
  • Dan Crenshaw R-TX-2
  • Neal P. Dunn R-FL-2
  • Mike Flood R-NE-1
  • Vince Fong R-CA-20
  • Russ Fulcher R-ID-1
  • Craig A. Goldman R-TX-12
  • Lance Gooden R-TX-5
  • H. Morgan Griffith R-VA-9
  • Glenn Grothman R-WI-6
  • Diana Harshbarger R-TN-1
  • J. French Hill R-AR-2
  • Bill Huizenga R-MI-4
  • Wesley Hunt R-TX-38
  • John James R-MI-10
  • Mike Kelly R-PA-16
  • Kevin Kiley I-CA-3
  • Rep. Doug LaMalfa R-CA-1
  • Nicholas A. Langworthy R-NY-23
  • Robert E. Latta R-OH-5
  • Tracey Mann R-KS-1
  • Lisa C. McClain R-MI-9
  • Mark B. Messmer R-IN-8
  • Tim Moore R-NC-14
  • Jay Obernolte R-CA-23
  • Andrew Ogles R-TN-5
  • Gary J. Palmer R-AL-6
  • August Pfluger R-TX-11
  • Michael A. Rulli R-OH-6
  • Pete Sessions R-TX-17
  • Claudia Tenney R-NY-24
  • Randy K. Weber, Sr. R-TX-14
  • Daniel Webster R-FL-11
  • Roger Williams R-TX-25
  • Rudy Yakym III R-IN-2