29 U.S.C. 1322a: Multiemployer plan benefits guaranteed

Created in 1980 by Public Law 93-406. Changed by 4 later laws. No bill we track in this Congress changes it.

9 other sections of the Code cite this one, including 29 U.S.C. 1085, 29 U.S.C. 1301, 29 U.S.C. 1305, 29 U.S.C. 1306, 29 U.S.C. 1411.

How it got hereLaws that created or changed it, newest first

2014Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015

2000Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001

1989Pub. L. 101-239

1986Pub. L. 99-272

1980Pub. L. 93-406added it

29 U.S.C. 1322aMultiemployer plan benefits guaranteed

(a)Benefits of covered plans subject to guarantee

(b)Benefits or benefit increases not eligible for guarantee

(c)Determinations respecting amount of guarantee

(d)Amount of guarantee of reduced benefit

(e)Ineligibility of benefits for guarantee

(f)Study, report, etc., respecting premium increase in existing basic-benefit guarantee levels; Congressional procedures applicable for revision of schedules

(g)Guarantee of payment of other classes of benefits and establishment of terms and conditions of guarantee; promulgation of regulations for establishment of supplemental program to guarantee benefits otherwise ineligible; status of benefits; applicability of revised schedule of premiums

(h)Applicability to nonforfeitable benefits accrued as of July 30, 1980; manner and extent of guarantee

This CongressBills that change it or would

None we track

past change
enacted this Congress
proposed

This Congress

No bill we track in the 119th Congress changes this section.

How it got here

2014

Pub. L. 113–235 added par. (4). (Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015) Law text · (c)

2000

Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(6) [title IX, §951(a)(1)], substituted "$11" for "$5" in two places. (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001) Law text · (c)
Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(6) [title IX, §951(a)(2)], substituted "$33" for "$15". (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001) Law text · (c)
Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(6) [title IX, §951(a)(3)], redesignated pars. (3) and (4) as (2) and (3), respectively, and struck out former pars. (2), (5), and (6). Prior to amendment, par. (2) modified the amount of benefits guaranteed under par. (1) with respect to plans described… (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001) Law text · (c)

1989

Pub. L. 101–239, §7894(g)(3)(C)(i), substituted "this subchapter" for "section 1321 of this title". · (a)
Pub. L. 101–239, §7891(a)(1), substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text. · (c), (4), (5), (6), (d), (g)
Pub. L. 101–239, §7893(b), substituted "the enactment" for "the the enactment". · (f)

1986

Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(4), substituted "the enactment of a joint resolution" for "Congress by concurrent resolution". · (f)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(5), substituted "so enacted" for "approved". · (f)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(6), substituted "enactment of a joint resolution" for "Congress by concurrent resolution". · (f)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(7), substituted "joint" for "concurrent". · (f)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(8), substituted "joint" for "concurrent" in two places and "The" for "That the Congress favors the" and inserted "is hereby approved". · (f)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(9), substituted "joint" for "concurrent". · (f)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(10), substituted "joint" for "concurrent" and "enacted" for "adopted". · (g)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(11), substituted "joint" for "concurrent" in two places and "The" for "That the Congress disapproves the" and inserted "is hereby disapproved". · (g)
Pub. L. 99–272, §11005(c)(12), substituted "joint" for "concurrent". · (g)

Text, outline and history from the official U.S. Code (2024 edition) on GovInfo, published by the Office of the Law Revision Counsel. Changes made after that edition appear under This Congress.