WHAT THE LAW DOINCongress, in plain words

H.R. 3037 · 119th Congress

Access to Breast Cancer Diagnosis Act of 2025

IntroducedHealth
IntroducedApr 28, 2025
Passed HouseNot yet
Passed SenateNot yet
To PresidentNot yet
Became lawNot yet

Where it stands

Introduced. Latest step, Apr 28, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Committee on Ways and Means. It would change 3 sections of existing law.

How this bill changes the law

Sourced

H.R. 3037 would change 3 sections of existing law. Read from the bill text as introduced in the House (Apr 28, 2025).

42 U.S.C. 300gg-11 No lifetime or annual limits

42 U.S.C. 18011 Preservation of right to maintain existing coverage

  • (a) No changes to existing coverage added to · Sec. 2(b) · see the words

26 U.S.C. 223 Health savings accounts

  • (c) Definitions and special rules added to · Sec. 2(c) · see the words
What the words would change: every change, in place (4)

Today's wording of each part of the law, with what would be struck out and added. Each change also gives the bill's own instruction, word for word.

  1. 42 U.S.C. 300gg-11added 2730by H.R. 3037 Sec. 2(a)

    2730 Diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations.—(a) In general.— In the case of a group health plan, or a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage, that provides benefits with respect to diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations furnished to an individual enrolled under such plan or such coverage, such plan or coverage shall not impose any cost-sharing requirements for these benefits.(b) Construction.— Nothing in this section shall be construed—(1) to prohibit a group health plan or health insurance issuer from requiring timely prior authorization or imposing other appropriate utilization controls in approving coverage for any diagnostic and supplemental breast examination; or(2) to supersede a State law that provides greater protections with respect to the coverage of diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations than is provided under this section.(c) Definitions.— In this section:(1) Cost-sharing requirements.— The term cost-sharing requirements means a deductible, coinsurance, copayment, and any maximum limitation on the application of such a deductible, coinsurance, copayment or similar out-of-pocket expense.(2) Diagnostic breast examination.— The term diagnostic breast examination means a medically necessary and appropriate (in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines) examination of the breast (including, but not limited to such an examination using diagnostic mammography, breast magnetic resonance imaging, or breast ultrasound) that is—(A) used to evaluate an abnormality seen or suspected from a screening examination for breast cancer; or(B) used to evaluate an abnormality detected by another means of examination.(3) Supplemental breast examinations.— The term supplemental breast examination means a medically necessary and appropriate (in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines) examination of the breast (including, but not limited to such an examination using breast magnetic resonance imaging or breast ultrasound) that is—(A) used to screen for breast cancer when there is no abnormality seen or suspected; and(B) furnished based on personal or family medical history or additional factors that may increase the individual’s risk of breast cancer.

    The bill says: Subpart II of part A of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–11 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

  2. 42 U.S.C. 18011(a)(4)(A)changedby H.R. 3037 Sec. 2(b)

    The bill says: by striking "title" and inserting "title, or as added after the date of the enactment of this Act"; and

  3. 42 U.S.C. 18011(a)(4)(A)added (v)by H.R. 3037 Sec. 2(b)

    (v) Section 2730 (relating to coverage for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations).

    The bill says: by adding at the end the following new clause:

  4. 26 U.S.C. 223(c)(2)added (H)by H.R. 3037 Sec. 2(c)

    (H) Safe harbor for absence of deductible for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations.— In the case of plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, a plan shall not fail to be treated as a high deductible health plan by reason of failing to have a deductible for diagnostic and supplemental breast examinations.

    The bill says: Section 223(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:

From the bill's official text on GovInfo and the U.S. Code, 2024 edition, which may not yet show changes made since.

What it does

Sourced

The Congressional Research Service hasn't published a summary of this bill yet. They usually follow within weeks of introduction.

Our plain-language breakdown, with what it means for you and the case for and against, is written once a bill starts to move.

What has happened

Sourced
  1. Apr 28, 2025Introduced in HouseLibrary of Congress

Show all 4 recorded actions

Cosponsors

  • Don Bacon R-NE-2
  • Nanette Diaz Barragán D-CA-44
  • Joyce Beatty D-OH-3
  • Wesley Bell D-MO-1
  • Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr. R-PA-8
  • Julia Brownley D-CA-26
  • Janelle S. Bynum D-OR-5
  • Troy A. Carter D-LA-2
  • Yvette D. Clarke D-NY-9
  • Angie Craig D-MN-2
  • Donald G. Davis D-NC-1
  • Madeleine Dean D-PA-4
Show 55 more cosponsors
  • Lloyd Doggett D-TX-37
  • Chuck Edwards R-NC-11
  • Sarah Elfreth D-MD-3
  • Brian K. Fitzpatrick R-PA-1
  • Daniel S. Goldman D-NY-10
  • Maggie Goodlander D-NH-2
  • Josh Gottheimer D-NJ-5
  • Adelita S. Grijalva D-AZ-7
  • Jahana Hayes D-CT-5
  • Chrissy Houlahan D-PA-6
  • Julie Johnson D-TX-32
  • Thomas H. Kean, Jr. R-NJ-7
  • Robin L. Kelly D-IL-2
  • Timothy M. Kennedy D-NY-26
  • Young Kim R-CA-40
  • Nick LaLota R-NY-1
  • Greg Landsman D-OH-1
  • Nicholas A. Langworthy R-NY-23
  • John B. Larson D-CT-1
  • Michael Lawler R-NY-17
  • Teresa Leger Fernandez D-NM-3
  • Ted Lieu D-CA-36
  • Stephen F. Lynch D-MA-8
  • Ryan Mackenzie R-PA-7
  • Lucy McBath D-GA-6
  • Jennifer L. McClellan D-VA-4
  • James P. McGovern D-MA-2
  • Max L. Miller R-OH-7
  • Gwen Moore D-WI-4
  • Joseph D. Morelle D-NY-25
  • Seth Moulton D-MA-6
  • Joe Neguse D-CO-2
  • Eleanor Holmes Norton D-DC-At Large
  • Scott H. Peters D-CA-50
  • Chellie Pingree D-ME-1
  • Mark Pocan D-WI-2
  • Jamie Raskin D-MD-8
  • Josh Riley D-NY-19
  • Deborah K. Ross D-NC-2
  • Kim Schrier D-WA-8
  • Adam Smith D-WA-9
  • Melanie A. Stansbury D-NM-1
  • Haley M. Stevens D-MI-11
  • Claudia Tenney R-NY-24
  • Shri Thanedar D-MI-13
  • Rashida Tlaib D-MI-12
  • Paul Tonko D-NY-20
  • Lori Trahan D-MA-3
  • Jefferson Van Drew R-NJ-2
  • Beth Van Duyne R-TX-24
  • Derrick Van Orden R-WI-3
  • Eugene Simon Vindman D-VA-7
  • James R. Walkinshaw D-VA-11
  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz D-FL-25
  • Joe Wilson R-SC-2