WHAT THE LAW DOINCongress, in plain words

H.R. 3095 · 119th Congress

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate single, unique ZIP Codes for certain communities, and for other purposes.

Passed HouseGovernment Operations and Politics
IntroducedApr 30, 2025
Passed HouseJul 21, 2025
Passed SenateNot yet
To PresidentNot yet
Became lawNot yet

Where it stands

Passed House. Latest step, Jul 22, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The House passed it 278–121. All 4 of Iowa's representatives voted yes in the House. It would change 0 sections of existing law and would add 1 new provisions of its own.

How this bill changes the law

Sourced

H.R. 3095 doesn't change any existing section of law. It would create 1 new provision of its own. Read from the bill text as sent to the Senate (Jul 22, 2025).

New provisions of the bill's own

  • Sec. 1 Single, unique zip codes for certain communities
What the words would change: every change, in place (0)

Today's wording of each part of the law, with what would be struck out and added. Each change also gives the bill's own instruction, word for word.

    From the bill's official text on GovInfo and the U.S. Code, latest edition, which may not yet show changes made since.

    What it does

    Sourced

    This bill requires the U.S Postal Service to designate a single, unique ZIP Code for each of the following 74 communities:

    • Canyon Lake, California

    • Eastvale, California

    • Hidden Hills, California

    • Industry, California

    • North Tustin, California

    • Tehachapi, California

    • Castle Pines, Colorado

    • Centennial, Colorado

    • Cherry Hills Village, Colorado

    • Greenwood Village, Colorado

    • Highlands Ranch, Colorado

    • Keystone, Colorado

    • Lone Tree, Colorado

    • Mountain Village, Colorado

    • Mt Crested Butte, Colorado

    • Severance, Colorado

    • Silver Cliff, Colorado

    • Sterling Ranch, Colorado

    • Superior, Colorado

    • Telluride, Colorado

    • Scotland, Connecticut

    • Estero, Florida

    • Ft Myers, Florida

    • Hollywood, Florida

    • Oakland Park, Florida

    • Lighthouse Point, Florida

    • Coconut Creek, Florida

    • Parkland, Florida

    • Deerfield Beach, Florida

    • Wilton Manors, Florida

    • Burr Ridge, Illinois

    • Carmel, Indiana

    • Noblesville, Indiana

    • Westfield, Indiana

    • Zionsville, Indiana

    • Urbandale, Iowa

    • Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    • Montz, Louisiana

    • Springwater Township, Minnesota

    • Grass Valley, Nevada

    • Swanzey, New Hampshire

    Read the whole official summary (293 words, about 1 min)

    • Kinnelon, New Jersey

    • Mendham Township, New Jersey

    • Flanders, New York

    • Glendale, New York

    • Riverside, New York

    • Pendelton, New York

    • Northampton, New York

    • Harnett County, North Carolina

    • Weddington, North Carolina

    • Goose Creek, South Carolina

    • Fairview, Texas

    • Fate, Texas

    • Heath, Texas

    • Murphy, Texas

    • Northlake, Texas

    • Parker, Texas

    • Sargent, Texas

    • Fairlawn, Virginia

    • Caledonia, Wisconsin

    • Franklin, Wisconsin

    • Glendale, Wisconsin

    • Greenfield, Wisconsin

    • Village of Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin

    • Village of Somers, Wisconsin

    • Village of Harrison, Wisconsin

    • Mills, Wyoming

    • Hochatown, Oklahoma

    • North Enid, Oklahoma

    • Green, Ohio

    • Rochester, Wisconsin

    • Quartzite Township, Minnesota

    • Frederick, Colorado

    • Camargo, Kentucky

    Official summary by the Congressional Research Service (Introduced in House, Apr 30, 2025).

    Our plain-language breakdown, with what it means for you and the case for and against, is written once a bill starts to move.

    What has happened

    Sourced
    1. Jul 21, 2025Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 278 - 121 (Roll no. 213). (text: CR H3493: 1) Roll call recordLibrary of Congress
    2. Apr 30, 2025Introduced in HouseLibrary of Congress

    Show all 14 recorded actions

    Recorded votes

    Sourced
    1. Jul 21, 2025 · HousePassed 278–121
      Iowa: Randy Feenstra yes, Ashley Hinson yes, Mariannette Miller-Meeks yes, Zachary Nunn yes
      On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended · needed two-thirds
      R 203 yes, 0 noD 75 yes, 121 noEach member · Record

    Cosponsors

    • Mark E. Amodei R-NV-2
    • Andy Barr R-KY-6
    • Sean Casten D-IL-6
    • Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. D-CA-31
    • Joe Courtney D-CT-2
    • Jason Crow D-CO-6
    • Byron Donalds R-FL-19
    • Gabe Evans R-CO-8
    • Pat Fallon R-TX-4
    • Brad Finstad R-MN-1
    • Scott Fitzgerald R-WI-5
    • Brandon Gill R-TX-26
    Show 21 more cosponsors
    • H. Morgan Griffith R-VA-9
    • Harriet M. Hageman R-WY-At Large
    • Mark Harris R-NC-8
    • Clay Higgins R-LA-3
    • Jeff Hurd R-CO-3
    • Young Kim R-CA-40
    • Nick LaLota R-NY-1
    • Nicholas A. Langworthy R-NY-23
    • Julia Letlow R-LA-5
    • Nancy Mace R-SC-1
    • Gwen Moore D-WI-4
    • Jared Moskowitz D-FL-23
    • Troy E. Nehls R-TX-22
    • Brittany Pettersen D-CO-7
    • Linda T. Sánchez D-CA-38
    • Keith Self R-TX-3
    • Brad Sherman D-CA-32
    • Rep. Mikie Sherrill D-NJ-11
    • Bryan Steil R-WI-1
    • Emilia Strong Sykes D-OH-13
    • William R. Timmons IV R-SC-4