WHAT THE LAW DOINCongress, in plain words

H.R. 6387 · 119th Congress

FIRE Act

Passed HouseEnvironmental Protection
IntroducedDec 3, 2025
Passed HouseApr 22, 2026
Passed SenateNot yet
To PresidentNot yet
Became lawNot yet

Where it stands

Passed House. Latest step, Apr 27, 2026: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. The House passed it 220–198. All 4 of Iowa's representatives voted yes in the House. It would change 1 section of existing law.

How this bill changes the law

Sourced

H.R. 6387 would change 1 section of existing law. Read from the bill text as sent to the Senate (Apr 27, 2026).

42 U.S.C. 7619 Air quality monitoring

  • (b) Air quality monitoring data influenced by exceptional events removed · Sec. 2(1), Sec. 2(2), Sec. 2(3), Sec. 2(4), Sec. 2(5), Sec. 2(6) · see the words
What the words would change: every change, in place (20)

Today's wording of each part of the law, with what would be struck out and added. Each change also gives the bill's own instruction, word for word.

  1. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(1)

    The bill says: in the subsection heading, by inserting "Or actions To mitigate wildfire risk" after "Events";

  2. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(1)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(2)

    (1) Definition of exceptional eventDefinitions. In this section: The term "exceptional event" means an event that— (i) affects air quality; (ii) is not reasonably controllable or preventable; (iii) is an event caused by human activity that is unlikely to recur at a particular location…

    The bill says: in the paragraph heading, by striking "Definition of exceptional event" and inserting "Definitions";

  3. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(1)(A)renumberedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(2)

    The bill says: in subparagraph (A), by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv), as subclauses (I) through (IV), respectively;

  4. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(1)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(2)

    (A) Exceptional event.—(i) In general.— The term exceptional event means an event that—

    The bill says: by striking "(A)" and all that follows through "an event that—" and inserting the following:

  5. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(1)rewrittenby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(2)

    (III) is an event that is—(aa) a natural event;(bb) caused by a human activity that is intended to mirror the occurrence or reoccurrence of a natural event; or(cc) caused by a human activity that is unlikely to recur; and

    The bill says: by amending subclause (III) of subparagraph (A)(i), as redesignated, to read as follows:

  6. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(1)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(2)

    (ii) Exclusions.— In this subsection, the term exceptional event does not include—(I) ordinarily occurring stagnation of air masses;(II) meteorological inversions; or(III) air pollution relating to source noncompliance.

    The bill says: by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the following:

  7. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(1)added (B)by H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(2)

    (B) Action to mitigate wildfire risk.— The term action to mitigate wildfire risk means a prescribed fire or similar measure, undertaken in accordance with State approved practices, to reduce the risk and severity of wildfires.

    The bill says: by adding at the end the following:

  8. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(2)(A)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(3)

    The bill says: by striking "March 1, 2006" and inserting "18 months after the date of enactment of the FIRE Act";

  9. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(2)(A)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(3)

    The bill says: by inserting "revisions to" before "regulations"; and

  10. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(2)(A)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(3)

    The bill says: by adding "or actions to mitigate wildfire risk" before the period at the end;

  11. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(2)(B)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(3)

    The bill says: by inserting "including proposed revisions to regulations," after "subparagraph (A),";

  12. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(2)(B)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(3)

    The bill says: by inserting "or action to mitigate wildfire risk" after "an exceptional event"; and

  13. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(2)(B)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(3)

    The bill says: by striking "paragraph (3)" and inserting "this section"; and

  14. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(2)added (C)by H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(3)

    (C) Regional analysis.— When more than one State notifies the Administrator of its intent to submit a petition pursuant to this section for an exceptional event or an action to mitigate wildfire risk for the same air quality event, or, if the Administrator determines such a multistate air quality event has occurred, the Administrator shall conduct regional modeling and analysis sufficient to satisfy the demonstration required for an exceptional event or an action to mitigate wildfire risk petition for such air quality event.(D) Transparency.— Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of the FIRE Act, the Administrator shall establish, and thereafter update monthly, a public website describing the status of all petitions submitted pursuant to this section for exceptional events and actions to mitigate wildfire risk.

    The bill says: by adding at the end the following:

  15. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(3)(A)renumberedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(4)

    The bill says: by redesignating clauses (ii) through (v) as clauses (iii) through (vi), respectively; and

  16. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(3)(A)added (ii)by H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(4)

    (ii) the principle that actions to mitigate wildfire risk can play an important role in reducing the magnitude and frequency of wildfires;

    The bill says: by inserting after clause (i) the following:

  17. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(3)(B)(i)changedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(5)

    The bill says: in clause (i), by inserting "or action to mitigate wildfire risk" before "must be";

  18. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(3)(B)rewrittenby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(5)

    The bill says: by amending clause (ii) to read as follows:

  19. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)(3)(B)rewrittenby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(5)

    (iv) there are criteria and procedures for the Governor of a State to petition the Administrator to exclude air quality monitoring data that is directly due to exceptional events or actions to mitigate wildfire risk from use in determinations by the Administrator with respect to—(I) area or source exceedances or violations of the national ambient air quality standards;(II) the designation, redesignation, classification, or reclassification of an area;(III) the demonstration by a State of attainment of a national ambient air quality standard;(IV) attainment determinations;(V) attainment date extensions;(VI) finding a State implementation plan to be inadequate; or(VII) preconstruction demonstrations under section 165(a)(3).

    The bill says: by amending clause (iv) to read as follows:

  20. 42 U.S.C. 7619(b)removedby H.R. 6387 Sec. 2(6)

    The bill says: by striking paragraph (4).

From the bill's official text on GovInfo and the U.S. Code, 2024 edition, which may not yet show changes made since.

What it does

Sourced

Fire Improvement and Reforming Exceptional Events Act or the FIRE Act

This bill modifies the definition of exceptional events under the Clean Air Act and requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise its regulations regarding exceptional events or actions to mitigate wildfire risk.

Generally, the EPA must exclude data from use in determinations of exceedances and violations of national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) if a state demonstrates that an exceptional event caused a specific air pollution concentration.

The bill provides that events caused by human activity that are intended to mirror the occurrence or reoccurrence of a natural event are exceptional events. Additionally, the bill no longer excludes from consideration as an exceptional event (1) meteorological events involving high temperatures or a lack of precipitation, or (2) stagnation of air masses that does not ordinarily occur.

The bill requires the EPA to revise regulations regarding the reviewing and handling of air quality monitoring data influenced by actions to mitigate wildfire risk.

The bill also requires the EPA to conduct regional modeling and analysis when multiple states submit petitions regarding the same exceptional event or action to mitigate wildfire risk.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service (Reported to House, Apr 9, 2026).

Our plain-language breakdown, with what it means for you and the case for and against, is written once a bill starts to move.

What has happened

Sourced
  1. Apr 27, 2026Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.Senate
  2. Apr 22, 2026Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.House floor actions
  3. Apr 22, 2026On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 198 (Roll no. 136). (text: CR 4/21/2026 H3013) Roll call recordHouse floor actions
  4. Apr 22, 2026Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 220 - 198 (Roll no. 136). (text: CR 4/21/2026 H3013) Roll call recordLibrary of Congress
  5. Apr 22, 2026On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 206 - 214 (Roll no. 135). Roll call recordHouse floor actions
  6. Apr 22, 2026Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3064-3065)House floor actions
  7. Apr 21, 2026POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 6387, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Dexter demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.House floor actions
  8. Apr 21, 2026The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.House floor actions
  9. Apr 21, 2026Ms. Dexter moved to recommit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (CR H3019)House floor actions
  10. Apr 21, 2026The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.House floor actions
  11. Apr 21, 2026DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 6387.House floor actions
  12. Apr 21, 2026Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, H.R. 6409 and H. Res. 1156. The resolution provides for consideration of each measure under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides one motion to recommit on H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, and H.R. 6409.House floor actions
  13. Apr 21, 2026Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1174. (consideration: CR H3013-3019; text: CR H3013)House floor actions
  14. Apr 15, 2026Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1174 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, H.R. 6409 and H. Res. 1156. The resolution provides for consideration of each measure under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides one motion to recommit on H.R. 6387, H.R. 6398, and H.R. 6409.House floor actions
  15. Apr 9, 2026Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 515.House floor actions
  16. Apr 9, 2026Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-595.House floor actions
  17. Apr 9, 2026Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-595.Library of Congress
  18. Jan 21, 2026Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 23.House committee actions
  19. Jan 21, 2026Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldHouse committee actions
  20. Dec 10, 2025Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 13 - 10.House committee actions
  21. Dec 10, 2025Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldHouse committee actions
  22. Dec 3, 2025Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment.House committee actions
  23. Dec 3, 2025Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.House floor actions
  24. Dec 3, 2025Introduced in HouseLibrary of Congress
  25. Dec 3, 2025Introduced in HouseLibrary of Congress

Show key steps only

Recorded votes

Sourced
  1. Apr 22, 2026 · HousePassed 220–198
    On Passage · needed a majority
    R 211 yes, 1 noI 1 yes, 0 noD 8 yes, 197 noEach member · Record
1 other recorded vote (procedure and amendments)
  1. Apr 22, 2026 · HouseFailed 206–214
    On Motion to Recommit · needed a majority
    R 0 yes, 213 noI 0 yes, 1 noD 206 yes, 0 noEach member · Record

Cosponsors

  • Jeff Crank R-CO-5
  • Paul A. Gosar R-AZ-9
  • Adam Gray D-CA-13