What it does
SourcedRatepayer Protection Act
The bill requires state utility regulators and nonregulated utilities to consider implementing a standard to hold certain large-load customers responsible for the costs associated with any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade of electric service necessary to serve such customers. A large-load customer means a non-residential electric consumer that enters, or requests to enter, an agreement concerning the sale of electric energy primarily to operate information technology infrastructure and related systems pertaining to data storage and computational applications and services (e.g., data centers) that have a peak electric demand of 100 megawatts or more at a single site or campus.
Specifically, the bill requires states to consider implementing a federal standard for large-load customers. The standard must require rates charged by electric utilities for providing electric service to a large-load customer to be designed to recover from the large-load customer the full, incremental cost of any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade necessary to serve such customer. This rate must include the costs that would be incurred if the large-load customer terminates an agreement with the electric utility pertaining to the sale of electric energy or otherwise ceases the purchase of energy from the electric utility.
Under the standard, an electric utility must require the large-load customer to provide to the utility financial assurances or contributions to cover the cost of any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade that is necessary to serve the load of a large-load customer before the utility makes any generation, transmission, or distribution upgrade.
Official summary by the Congressional Research Service (Reported to House, Sep 10, 2026).
Our plain-language breakdown, with what it means for you and the case for and against, is written once a bill starts to move.
What has happened
Sourced- Sep 16, 2026Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 417 - 3 (Roll no. 312). (text: CR H5656-5657) Roll call recordLibrary of Congress
- Sep 10, 2026Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-814.Library of Congress
- Jun 18, 2026Introduced in HouseLibrary of Congress
Recorded votes
Sourced- Sep 16, 2026 · HousePassed 417–3On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended · needed two-thirds
1 other recorded vote (procedure and amendments)
- Sep 30, 2026 · SenateCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected 57–43Iowa: Joni Ernst yes, Chuck Grassley yesOn Cloture on the Motion to Proceed · needed three-fifths
Cosponsors
- Tom Barrett R-MI-7
- Michael Baumgartner R-WA-5
- Sanford D. Bishop, Jr. D-GA-2
- Lauren Boebert R-CO-4
- Earl L. "Buddy" Carter R-GA-1
- Kathy Castor D-FL-14
- Ben Cline R-VA-6
- Jeff Crank R-CO-5
- Henry Cuellar D-TX-28
- Monica De La Cruz R-TX-15
- Pat Fallon R-TX-4
- Brad Finstad R-MN-1
Show 30 more cosponsors
- Brian K. Fitzpatrick R-PA-1
- Mike Flood R-NE-1
- Clay Fuller R-GA-14
- Maggie Goodlander D-NH-2
- Josh Gottheimer D-NJ-5
- H. Morgan Griffith R-VA-9
- Harriet M. Hageman R-WY-At Large
- Bill Huizenga R-MI-4
- Jeff Hurd R-CO-3
- Jim Jordan R-OH-4
- John Joyce R-PA-13
- Thomas H. Kean, Jr. R-NJ-7
- Jennifer A. Kiggans R-VA-2
- Michael Lawler R-NY-17
- Laurel M. Lee R-FL-15
- Ryan Mackenzie R-PA-7
- Michael T. McCaul R-TX-10
- Jennifer L. McClellan D-VA-4
- Kristen McDonald Rivet D-MI-8
- John J. McGuire III R-VA-5
- John R. Moolenaar R-MI-2
- Riley M. Moore R-WV-2
- Robert F. Onder, Jr. R-MO-3
- Christopher H. Smith R-NJ-4
- David G. Valadao R-CA-22
- Jefferson Van Drew R-NJ-2
- Beth Van Duyne R-TX-24
- Derrick Van Orden R-WI-3
- Randy K. Weber, Sr. R-TX-14
- Robert J. Wittman R-VA-1