WHAT THE LAW DOINCongress, in plain words

H.Res. 1009 · 119th Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Passed HouseCongress
IntroducedJan 20, 2026
Passed HouseJan 21, 2026

Where it stands

Passed House. Latest step, Jan 21, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. The House passed it 213–210. All 4 of Iowa's representatives voted yes in the House.

What it does

Sourced

Sets forth the rule for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6945) to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to clarify the authority of States to use funds for pregnancy centers, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6359) to require institutions of higher education to disseminate information on the rights of, and accommodations and resources for, pregnant students, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 140) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service (Reported to House, Jan 20, 2026).

Our plain-language breakdown, with what it means for you and the case for and against, is written once a bill starts to move.

What has happened

Sourced
  1. Jan 21, 2026Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 210 (Roll no. 35). (text: CR H1131-1132) Roll call recordLibrary of Congress

Show all 12 recorded actions

Recorded votes

Sourced
  1. Jan 21, 2026 · HousePassed 213–210
    Iowa: Randy Feenstra yes, Ashley Hinson yes, Mariannette Miller-Meeks yes, Zachary Nunn yes
    On Agreeing to the Resolution · needed a majority
    R 213 yes, 0 noD 0 yes, 210 noEach member · Record
1 other recorded vote (procedure and amendments)
  1. Jan 21, 2026 · HousePassed 212–210
    Iowa: Randy Feenstra yes, Ashley Hinson yes, Mariannette Miller-Meeks yes, Zachary Nunn yes
    On Ordering the Previous Question · needed a majority
    R 212 yes, 0 noD 0 yes, 210 noEach member · Record