WHAT THE LAW DOINCongress, in plain words

S.J.Res. 89 · 119th Congress

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

IntroducedPublic Lands and Natural Resources
IntroducedOct 8, 2025
Passed SenateNot yet
Passed HouseNot yet
To PresidentNot yet
Became lawNot yet

Where it stands

Introduced. Latest step, Nov 20, 2025: Indefinitely postponed by Senate by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8395)

What it does

Sourced

This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on November 20, 2024, which amended the 2015 resource management plan (RMP) for the Buffalo Field Office in Wyoming to make no federal coal available for future leasing. Thus, the joint resolution requires the BLM to follow the 2015 RMP as it was before it was amended in 2024 and make coal available for leasing.

By way of background, the BLM developed the amendment to the plan in response to Western Organization of Resource Councils v. Bureau of Land Management. In that case, the court held that the BLM must evaluate the climate impacts of federal coal leasing in the Buffalo Field Office and include alternatives to limit or stop coal leasing in the evaluation in order to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act. After conducting the evaluation, the BLM amended the RMP and made BLM-managed coal resources in the Buffalo Field Office planning area unavailable for future leasing.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service (Introduced in Senate, Oct 8, 2025).

Our plain-language breakdown, with what it means for you and the case for and against, is written once a bill starts to move.

What has happened

Sourced
  1. Oct 8, 2025Introduced in SenateLibrary of Congress

Show all 8 recorded actions

Recorded votes

Sourced
  1. Nov 19, 2025 · SenateMotion to Proceed Agreed to 51–47
    On the Motion to Proceed · needed a majority
    R 51 yes, 0 noI 0 yes, 2 noD 0 yes, 45 noEach member · Record

Cosponsors

  • John Barrasso R-WY